Putting the “Artificial” in “Intelligence”
“Artificial general intelligence: Are we close, and does it even make sense to try?
A machine that could think like a person has been the guiding vision of AI research since the earliest days—and remains its most divisive idea…”
In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters“
Manuel
Sam
👋 Sure thing!
Manuel
Thanks! I’ve read this article and I’m not sure I quite get the point. What is “AGI” exactly?
Sam
Ah, yes, that’s a tricky one … 😎😎
Sam
So basically “AI” just means “Artificial Intelligence”, and that’s hard enough to define, but “AGI” means “Artificial General Intelligence”
Manuel
Ok, and the difference is … ? 😅
Sam
Compare it to a toolbox: you have nails, you need a hammer. You need to find patterns in data, you need an AI 🤖
Sam
As Marvin Minsky once said, we could call a program “intelligent” if it does things in a way that we would call “intelligent” if a human did them
Manuel
So a machine is smart if it does things like a human?
Sam
Defining “intelligence” in general is really hard! AI systems are really good at things humans are really bad at, and really bad at things that are really easy for humans -> https://xkcd.com/1425/ (Moravec’s Paradox)
Manuel
So can we make an AI as smart as a human or no? 😆😆
Sam
Yes and no. We can make an AI do some tasks as well or faster than a human, but not in the same way a human does them, just like a car isn’t an artificial horse
Manuel
Ah, that clears it up. So a hammer is better than my fist at hammering in nails, but it is not a better hand overall. Right?
Sam
Yes, in a sense. What “AGI” wants to be, is an AI that is as intelligent as a human overall, not just for a specific task. But still not necessarily do things in the same way a human does
Manuel
So we have specialized AI systems that are good at one thing, but not a general AI that is good at everything?
Sam
Exactly. BUT! 😁😁😁
Manuel
… there’s always a but … 😆
Sam
Well, there is one approach that tries to imitate how humans learn to do things: artificial neural networks that imitate the structure of the brain and can learn, instead being programmed.
Manuel
They’re building a whole artificial brain? 🧠🤖
Sam
Not really no, these neural nets are generally simulated on ordinary computers 😊😊😊😊
Sam
In this way, AI’s have achieved human-level skills in games https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/alphago-zero-the-ai-that-taught-itself-go/543450/
Sam
and have learned to do more complex perception and motion https://www.bostondynamics.com/atlas
Manuel
Doesn’t this mean it is just “intelligent” full stop? What makes it “artificial”? “Artificial” makes it sound like its fake …
Sam
In a sense you are right, “artificial” is commonly used to indicate that something is not real, like artificial flavoring or coloring in food. A computer solves problems in a different way than a human, but if it gets the job done, there’s nothing “fake” about it
Manuel
OK, I’m going to read some stuff and get back to you.
Sam
Sure, have a nice weekend! 🖖🖖
Related post
0 Comments