ExcreMental

Jul 2, 2021Philosophy/Ethics, Tech0 comments

Thought is an adaptive brain-activity

Van de Grind, 1997, 16

Julia and John are talking about the following article: Theoretical Models of Consciousness

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Julia

Thank you for the instructions, I’ve started writing and have some questions

Today 16:42

John

Shoot! 😊

Today 16:43

Julia

Do you think I can quote some of the old texts in the article or is that too boring?

Today 16:43

John

Well, that depends. A short, punchy one-liner should be fine.

Today 16:44   

Julia

OK, here’s a few I was thinking about using:                                         

Today 16:45

Julia

“Thoughts stand in the same relation to the brain as urine to the kidneys” (Vogt,1846)

Today 16:46

Julia

“No thought without phosphorus” (Moleschott ,1852)                        

Today 16:46

Julia

“The brain creates a conscious field just as the stomach and digestive tract create digestion.” (Searle ,2005)

Today 16:47

John

Holy moly! Last one’s a bit long, but those are certainly fine!

Today 16:48   

Julia

Yeah, I was doubting that last one, but I wanted to show how we still think in those same terms about the brain and the mind  😊

Today 16:49

John

They do sound similar, but are they really the same, more than a century later?

Today 16:50   

Julia

I found someone saying literally the same thing as Searle, but it’s in French:

Today 16:50

Julia

Pour se faire une idée juste des opérations de la pensée, il faut considérer le cerveau comme un organe particulier, destiné spécialement à la produire; de même que l’estomac et les intestins à faire la digestion” (Cabanis ,1802)

Today 16:52

John

OK, that is too long and too French … my high school French is quite rusty, but that does sound like literally the same, yeah. 😊

Today 16:53   

Julia

Cabanis is basically saying that the brain produces though like the stomach produces digestion, so …

Today 16:54

John

You could just reference it, without the whole quote.

Today 16:54  

Julia

I guess that would work too.                                                                    

Today 16:55

John

Good find, those quotes are quite thought provoking. So are you arguing against progress in neuroscience?

Today 16:56   

Julia

Oh no, not at all! Just that there’s some very basic assumptions we’ve kept since the beginning. 😊

Today 16:57

John

OK, even more looking forward to your draft!

Today 16:58   

… Continue to read the conversation between John and Julia  on Saturday 10th July…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)

Loading...

Related post

Share This