Don’t know much about history, don’t know much psychology

Apr 4, 2022Philosophy/Ethics, Tech0 comments

Logical laws are identical with natural laws of thought. Logic is … a physics of thought, otherwise it is nothing

Lipps 1880

Julia and John are talking about the following article:
Psychologism

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Julia

In philosophy you had two camps: one group considered logic as the physics of thought

Today 17:08

Julia

logic is the set of laws that describe how we think, just like the law of gravitation describes how things fall

Today 17:08

John

Ok, that’s clear. The other group? 😊

Today 17:09   

Julia

The others thought logic is like an ethics of thought: what we should do if we want to think right

Today 17:09

John

I do understand the difference between those, but I’m still not sure why this would matter so much … for AI 🤔

Today 17:10   

Julia

Well, if I got things right, then the point is that in one case we can’t disobey the laws of thought, it’s just how we are wired?

Today 17:11

Julia

In the other case we choose to try to follow those laws, but we can fail. An AI could do the first, but not the second.

Today 17:11

John

Ah, now it is becoming clearer what the issue is! An AI can only do what it’s told to do, not choose what rules to follow.

Today 17:12  

Julia

Yes, also the difference would be between logic as an ideal theory or as a human practice

Today 17:12

John

Right, so is logic pre-given or do we develop it as seems fit to us?🤨

Today 17:13   

Julia

Exactly! That why everyone was accuring everyone else of being some kind of “psychologist”.

Today 17:12

John

What so bad about being a psychologist? I don’t get it …

Today 17:14   

Julia

In German there’s a difference between someone who practices psychology and philosophers who apply psychology where it doesn’t fit

Today 17:15

John

Somewhat like science and scientism?

Today 17:15   

Julia

Yes, that’s a good analogy: overextending the tools of one discipline to everything else

Today 17:16

John

But why was everyone name-calling everyone then? Isn’t is clear to which camp they would belong?

Today 17:17   

Julia

Well, if logic is hard wired in the brain, then you would be a “psychologist” in one sense, 😊

Today 17:18

Julia

but if logic is something humans build to fit their own needs then you would be a “psychologist” in another sense.

Today 17:18

John

This is all very confusing, I hope we can simplify that for the article.

Today 17:19   

Julia

Yes, perhaps we should leave the whole “psychologist” thing out, and focus on the physics vs ethics

Today 17:19

John

That would seem like a good idea, and make the link to AI more explicit!

Today 17:20   

Julia

I’ve actually got some good material on that from another group!

Today 17:20

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)

Loading...

Related post

Sketchy AI

Sketchy AI

“Young man, you don’t think I’m encountering constructive symbolism for the first time, do you? “Unplug”: free yourself from physicality, from the vulgar earthbound physicality, from the evils of civilization, from electricity, nerves, and so on. Isn’t that what this is? The association is crystal clear, I’d be tempted to say, perhaps even too obvious” (Kishon 1987)

read more
AI see, AI do

AI see, AI do

You young badgers imagine that it would be enough to smear a pound of paint on the canvas and you’re already a modern painter. I would be willing to accept this abomination for a bad joke, if there was even the slightest humor behind it. But this here is an abracadabra! A nothing!

read more
Share This