The Network is the Message
A continued stimulus, such as a state of tension, a light or a sound, produces a continued passage of sensory impulses to the central nervous system.
Adrian & Zotterman, 1926
Cho and John are talking about the following article:
Ask a Neuroscientist: What’s a spike train?
In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters“
Cho
Yes, it makes little sense to just zoom in on one single neuron
John
Information and information processing is distributed over the whole brain?
Cho
Well, not all of it all the time. Specific pathways and modules exist for specific types of information
John
Such as the “visual pathway” and stuff like that?
Cho
That’s a good example. The retina already detects and filters some signals right at the beginning
Cho
and then the associative cortex deals with the end product: there’s serial and parallel aspects at all levels.
John
Ok, so “it’s complicated”, again 😟
Cho
I’m afraid so! If I am not mistaken Sam once told me about his artificial neural networks and I was quite shocked at their simplicity
John
Simplicity? 🤔
Cho
John
So they forgot essential features?
Cho
John
Oh, right, that is a major difference of course!
Cho
Now I think he did tell me that there were new developments, there always are, which organized things in a more reasonable way
John
I think Sam is working with “spiking neural networks” nowadays?
Cho
That sounds promising. People tend to think neurons only fire now and then, but in fact they fire all the time
John
What do you mean?🤔
Cho
It’s not like they send on one impulse and then just sit there, as long as you are hearing the sound, seeing the color, etc. they fire!
John
Oh, ok, so there’s lots of spikes, not just one big yes or no signal?
Cho
Indeed, we normally speak of “spike trains”, more like a telegraphed message with lots of yesses and noes 😊
John
OK, this is very helpful 😉
… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Monday…
Related post
Total posts on the argument
What is AI compared to the hand that wields it?
It suddenly started drawing – in a naturalistic style. Yesterday I was watching it whizzing around, and the result really did look almost like you. That’s when I threw it away…
Anything is art if an AI says it is
Do not you understand? This is a whole new dimension, even according to the canons of the classical “art sacre”. This is a real revolution. Do you understand, ladies and gentlemen? This is the first hot plastic artwork! You! You! My boy … you are an artist!
Sketchy AI
“Young man, you don’t think I’m encountering constructive symbolism for the first time, do you? “Unplug”: free yourself from physicality, from the vulgar earthbound physicality, from the evils of civilization, from electricity, nerves, and so on. Isn’t that what this is? The association is crystal clear, I’d be tempted to say, perhaps even too obvious” (Kishon 1987)
AI see, AI do
You young badgers imagine that it would be enough to smear a pound of paint on the canvas and you’re already a modern painter. I would be willing to accept this abomination for a bad joke, if there was even the slightest humor behind it. But this here is an abracadabra! A nothing!
As far as AI can see
The case of the use of the abacus by Japanese school children and adults … tool’s use becomes incorporated into a culture-specific technology
All aboard the Spike Train!
The experimental results from neurobiology have lead to the investigation of a third generation of neural network models which …