A material program living in a material world
Thus, the only question which can reasonably be discussed at present is not whether robots can fall in love, or whether if they did we would say they were conscious, but rather ..
To what extent a digital computer can be programmed to exhibit the sort of simple intelligent behavior characteristic of children and sometimes animals, such as playing games, solving simple problems, reading sentences, and recognizing patterns
Dreyfus 1965
Julia and John are talking about the following article:
Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters“

Julia
In the beginning people thought General AI was just around the corner

John
Like in the ‘50s and ’60s? 😊

Julia
Yes, Newell and Simon were convinced that they already had a thinking machine (Computer Simulation of Human Thinking)

John
That does sound a bit ambitious, for the kind of equipment they had … 😅

Julia
Of course hype like that brought out many critics, famously Hubert Dreyfus

John
Not sure I’ve heard of him …

Julia
He was a philosopher, not an engineer, and wrote a book on “What Computers can’t do”

Julia
basically, that computers cannot understand the world like humans do

John
Oh, I remember Sam saying something about the world not being a chessboard , is it like that?

Julia
I think it is exactly that: computers lack the background knowledge about how things work

Julia
if it isn’t explicitly there in the algorithm, in the program, it doesn’t really exist for the computer

John
But that’s not how humans think, right?

Julia
Yep, Dreyfus was a phenomenologist and looked at how humans experience and act in the world

Julia
and AI’s lack the specific human way of “being in the world” as Heidegger called it

John
So that’s why AI’s would have a lot of trouble with stuff a little kid can do effortlessly? 😊

Julia
Indeed, but this also suggests a solution: put the AI in the world like a human 😊

John
Ah, of course, instead of a disembodied algorithm, you give it a robot body, and senses, and make it learn, and …

Julia
Bingo! Humans aren’t disembodied minds, so if you want human intelligence … 😊

John
Good stuff! But we should definitely check in with Sam about this too.

Julia
Sure, will do, and perhaps you can talk to Manuel, about the interview he did him?

John
Yes, and see if he has more material.

Julia
Great! Then we’ll catch up later 😉

John
See you soon! 😊
… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …
Related post
Total posts on the argument
The Digital Analogy
Computers are only prostheses; they no more do calculations than clocks tell the time. Clocks help us to tell the time, butthey don’t do it by themselves
Thinking in the Box
Even the simplest brains are awesome computational instruments, they do computations we do not know how to do, in ways we do not understand…
Wet Between the Ears
Sensations are received by a certain definite number of sensor nerves, which constitute the only means we possess of obtaining a knowledge of the external world …
Good Old Fashioned Artificial Neural Networks
With the determination of the net, the unknowable object of knowledge, the “thing in itself,” ceases to be unknowable …
Mental Programs
How do some humans try to solve some simple formal problems? This article is concerned with the psychology of human thinking …
Don’t know much about history, don’t know much psychology
Logical laws are identical with natural laws of thought. Logic is … a physics of thought, otherwise it is nothing
In this house we obey the laws of thought!
Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the more often and steadily we reflect upon them …