Robot See, Robot Do

Robot See, Robot Do

Robot See, Robot Do

 I do think that robots deserve rights and there are research projects being carried out today that are looking at robot laws.

African-American slaves were given rights when slavery was abolished and they became part of society.

Think of animals too – none of them had rights in the beginning but now animal rights are the norm. So if robots can interact with humans, they too should be given rights

Hiroshi Ishiguro

Manuel and Sam are talking about the following article:
Reality is catching up to science fiction

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

So the AI can fool a lot of people … in the sense that it can pass for human often enough? 😊

Today 11:36  

Sam

Something like that. For specific purposes we don’t need AGI                                            

Today 11:37

Manuel

OK, so the robot can react appropriately when it knows enough of the topic

Today 11:38   

Sam

Right, so as a receptionist at a hotel a robot doesn’t need to know everything, we can predict most of the questions that come up

Today 11:39  

Manuel

When is breakfast, where is my room, can you order a taxi, etc.

Today 11:39  

Sam

Exactly! So a robot that can move convincingly, speak convincingly, and then look really human  

Today 11:40  

Manuel

“look really human”, con you specify that? 🤗

Today 11:43   

Sam

Smile, nod, move their eyes around, gesticulate, have non-plasticky skin, no gaps, hinges, wires, etc.

Today 11:45   

Manuel

That’s a daunting list of do’s and don’ts, and I guess there is a lot more 🧐

Today 11:45   

Sam

Yep. But if we can do that, we can climb out of uncanny valley                             

Today 11:46

Manuel

So how do we do that? 🤔

Today 11:46  

Sam

Well, we did manage to tackle a large part of speech recognition and production …             

Today 11:46  

Manuel

… sure, fair enough, Siri and Alexa do work pretty well 😊

Today 11:47   

Sam

And we did that mostly by just studying humans and copying them 😊

Today 11:48   

Manuel

Right, to pass the Turing test, imitate a human, fool the judge

Today 11:48  

Sam

Correct. So now we need to do the same thing with the rest, both body and behavior            

Today 11:49   

Manuel

That would be a huge deal! 😁

Today 11:50   

Sam

Absolutely. And this is really necessary for empathy.                              

Today 11:50   

Sam

Tell me more!  😁                                                                          

Today 11:51   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sam 
on Saturday 24th April…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Coppélia 2.0

Coppélia 2.0

Coppélia 2.0

 He clasped the beautiful Olympia, and with her flew through the dance…

He thought that his dancing was usually correct as to time, but the peculiarly steady rhythm with which Olympia moved, and which often put him completely out, soon showed him that his time was most defective.
E.T.A. Hoffmann The Sandman, 1817

Manuel and Sam are talking about Boston Dynamics video

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Sam

I’ve read the post and I get why you came to me                                 

Today 11:35  

Manuel

Good! 😄

Today 11:36  

Sam

This is exactly the issue I would like to address, because it would make so many tasks easier                                              

Today 11:37

Manuel

Tasks, like …? 🤔

Today 11:38   

Sam

Let me start at the beginning! 😊

Humans have toyed with the idea of artificial humans as helpers since forever  

Today 11:39  

Manuel

OK  👌🏻

Today 11:39  

Sam

Finally we are really getting there, it’s not a myth or science fiction anymore                                         

Today 11:40  

Manuel

Fair enough, I’ve seen some pretty radical things coming from Japan lately

Today 11:43   

Sam

Indeed, and we can now build machines that can move almost like an animal or a human 🦾 🐕

Today 11:45   

Manuel

Oh, like the robots from Boston Dynamics! I saw them dancing, that was so cool! 😁

Weird, but cool!

Today 11:45   

Sam

“Weird” is the feeling a lot of people have, but robots can also be cute, like Wall-E or Pepper 😁                                  

Today 11:46

Manuel

That’s right, even when they are not humanoid at all, we can still relate to them

Today 11:46  

Sam

But when they look like a human, we dip into uncanny valley really fast                 

Today 11:46  

Manuel

So what is your take on this? 🤔

Today 11:47   

Sam

We need a robot that can move like human, fluidly, harmoniously …

Today 11:48   

Manuel

and we’re getting there, right?

Today 11:48  

Sam

Right, but also speak like a human, fluidly, harmoniously …              

Today 11:49   

Manuel

… harmoniously …?

Today 11:50   

Sam

I mean, in a way that fits naturally in a dialog                                      

Today 11:50   

Manuel

that seems pretty hard … wouldn’t that presuppose AGI?

Today 11:51   

Sam

Maybe we don’t need that if it can fool a lot of people a lot of the time …

Today 11:51   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sam 
on Saturday 17th April…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Handy Robots

Handy Robots

Handy Robots

If evolution really works, how come mothers only have two hands?…
Milton Berle

Manuel and Sam are talking about  ABB’s Collaborative YuMi Robot 

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

So we want a robot that is able to work in a human environment

Today 11:34   

Sam

Yes, it is hard to design a living or working space for both humans and robots 😅😅         

Today 11:35  

Manuel

So if the robots can just use the same stuff humans use, that’s easier 😉

Today 11:36  

Sam

Indeed, it is like you can “retrofit” automation into any workplace                                                         

Today 11:37

Manuel

But when you work side by side with a robot every day … 🧔🏻🤖

Today 11:37  

Sam

… you certainly want to avoid uncanny valley!                           

Today 11:38

Manuel

And there is more?

Today 11:38   

Sam

Imagine having a virtual assistant with a real robot body …    

Today 11:39  

Manuel

That would be nice! 😏

Today 11:39  

Sam

So you talk to them, they talk back, and do things, like hand you something                                              

Today 11:40  

Manuel

I see what you’re getting at …

Today 11:43   

Sam

If the person at the desk falls in the deep end of uncanny valley that is so much worse!

Today 11:45   

Manuel

So for face-to-face interaction, you want a humanoid robot, but it needs to be really really good. 😊

Today 11:45   

Sam

Precisely, and that is really really hard.                                       

Today 11:46

Manuel

So the article was right: the problem really is interaction and empathy

Today 11:46  

Sam

I think I need to go read this blogpost now … 🤔                        

Today 11:46  

Manuel

Good idea, but I really want to hear about the robot you are designing too! 🤗

Today 11:46   

Sam

Absolutely, all in good time. 👍                                                      

Today 11:46   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sam 
on Saturday 10th April…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

In Our Image

In Our Image

In Our Image

Care-O-bot 4

Developers did not want its appearance to be over-human, as this would “encourage false expectations with regard to its capabilities” for users…
Read the complete article that Manuel and Sam are discussing at:

Care-O-bot 4 Is the Robot Servant

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

Hi Sam! I came across an interesting blogpost on robots and empathy …

Today 11:34   

Sam

Hi Manuel! So now you want to chat about robots? 😅😅         

Today 11:35  

Manuel

Yep! 😁

Today 11:36  

Sam

 .. Be my guest!                                                                                 

Today 11:37

Manuel

So this blog was all about Uncanny Valley and how we relate to robots 🤖

Today 11:37  

Sam

Yeah, uncanny valley really is a problem 🤔...   we really want to make robots that people can relate to, but it’s hard!

Today 11:38

Manuel

Seems like it makes more sense not to try …?

Today 11:38   

Sam

How do you mean?  🤔 🤔                                                               

Today 11:39  

Manuel

Well, you’re the expert, but I seem to understand that it is easier to make a friendly, relatable robot that doesn’t look like a human at all

Today 11:39  

Sam

Ah, ok, yes, in a sense, yes …                                                         

Today 11:40  

Manuel

… but …? 😏

Today 11:43   

Sam

For some tasks a human form makes no sense at all, e.g. industrial robots 🤖

Today 11:45   

Manuel

Right 👍

Today 11:45   

Sam

But in most places where humans and robots work together, everything is built for humans

Today 11:46

Manuel

Ooh, that is a problem!

Today 11:46  

Sam

So we need robots that can interact with stuff made for humans.

Today 11:46  

Manuel

Mmh, I see, so body and limbs etc. need to be human shaped

Today 11:46   

Sam

Doorknobs are made for hands , keyboards and switches for fingers ☝️, stairs for legs 🦵, etc.

Today 11:46   

Manuel

So that’s why an artificial human would be a good appraoch

Today 11:47   

Sam

In many cases that’s exactly what you need, but there are lots of reasons why a human shape makes sense!

Today 11:48   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sam 
on Saturday 3rd April…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

 

Natural Born Robots

Natural Born Robots

Natural Born Robots

NATURAL BORN ROBOTS

Brooks introduces Nouvell AI, also called fundamentalist AI. He compares and contrasts his Nouvell AI with the then-mainstream symbol system, also called classical AI. Read the complete articole that Manuel and Sam are discussing about:

https://msujaws.wordpress.com/2010/11/18/elephants-dont-play-chess/

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

I was so hoping the hype were true …

Today 11:34   

Sam

Sorry to disappoint … 🙄😅😅                                                   

Today 11:35  

Manuel

So why isn’t AGI around the corner with these artificial brains?

Today 11:36  

Sam

😅 .. Again.. they’re not really artificial brains                          

Today 11:37

Sam

Neural networks make a lot of fairly simplistic assumptions about the brain being an information processor that just works with ones and zeroes

Today 11:37

Manuel

OK, fair enough, the model is simplistic. But it works! Right?

Today 11:38   

Sam

Yes it does, but we are training artificial neural networks in ways that don’t really match how brains learn, or how children learn

Today 11:39  

Manuel

How so? 😞

Today 11:39  

Sam

Apart from the brain having almost a 100 billion (with a b) neurons and the largest simulations barely cracking 10 million (with an m)?

Today 11:40  

Manuel

OK, ok, sure. But isn’t this about how they learn?

Today 11:43   

Sam

Yes, but the raw numbers are relevant too. Brains are fast and efficient because they are massively parallel: lots of problem solving all at once all over the place

Today 11:45   

Manuel

So the size of the brain has a lot to do with its speed?

Today 11:45   

Sam

Indeed, we don’t really know yet how and where all the computations take place

Today 11:46

Manuel

Aha, so because we don’t really know how human information processing works, we can’t really compare the two  🤓

Today 11:46  

Sam

Not just that, but also what kind of information is relevant to human processing

Today 11:46  

Manuel

Meaning? 😕

Today 11:46   

Sam

Well, humans make a lot of assumptions in the background, use lots of rules of thumb, apparently, to simplify their problems

Today 11:46   

Sam

We know what’s it like just live in a complex layered world full of meaning, more or less right from the start

Today 11:47   

Manuel

I guess, sure. The world isn’t a jumble of chaos that we interpret, in a sense we generally “just know” what stuff is. Is that it?

Today 11:47   

Sam

Indeed, and it is not at all easy to figure out how to have computers to the same. Simulating the entire world isn’t doable, but picking out what is relevant is also really hard

Today 11:48   

Manuel

I think I get it. So “Artificial General Intelligence” has more to do with general background knowledge than with general problem solving?

Today 11:48

Sam

Yes, it would mean that a robot in the real world would constantly be solving an immense number of problems that we don’t really even notice

Today 11:49   

Sam

It doesn’t know what is relevant and irrelevant, because …

Today 11:49   

Manuel

… the world isn’t a chessboard! I get it … ♟️♟️♟️

Today 11:50

Sam

But then again, maybe that’s just what we need: a robot that is born and evolves in our same naturel world. How could it come to understand it otherwise?

Today 11:51   

Manuel

🤖🤖 Robots!

Today 11:52

Manuel

I wanted to talk more about robots …

Today 11:52

Sam

Hey, I love talking about robots! Let’s do that next time       

Today 11:53   

Manuel

Thanks for the chat! 😄😄

Today 11:53

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post