Insert Coin to Pray

Insert Coin to Pray

Insert Coin to Pray

There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god

J. B. S. Haldane 1924
“Daedalus; or, Science and the Future”

Julia and John are talking about the following article:
Old World, High Tech

In this post the images comes from:

  1. Cottonbro from Pexels
  2. Maria Pop from Pexels

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Julia

Hi John! Cho told me you were working on something interesting … 😊                                                                                

Today 17:07

John

Hi Julia, yes, that’s right, on the link between science and sci-fi

Today 17:08   

Julia

Perhaps I can be of assistance …? I’ve taken a class of history of literature specializing in sci-fi

Today 17:08

John

Sounds interesting, we might be able to use that 😏

Today 17:09   

Julia

Yes, I was thinking, perhaps it makes sense to look at predictions that already have come true?

Today 17:09

John

Not exactly what we are looking for, but it might be good to have as supplementary materials

Today 17:10   

Julia

OK, so, you sometimes see Frankenstein as the first sci-fi book, but actually sci-fi is much older …

Today 17:11

John

Indeed, I’ve seen that claim a lot in the materials I’ve been looking at

Today 17:11  

Julia

Well, it might depend on how you define and classify things, but     

Today 17:12

Julia

there’s already androids and empires at war in space in ancient greek literature

Today 17:12

Julia

flying machines and mechanical birds in India, entire mechanical cities and a robot horse in Arabia

Today 17:12

John

Whoa, hold your horses! That is a lot! 🤗 Yes, I get why you thought this was relevant

Today 17:13   

Julia

Great! These aren’t exactly futuristic predictions however …             

Today 17:14

John

Indeed, so that makes it a bit harder to take up in this piece … but …

Today 17:14   

Julia

But?  🤔                                                                                                       

Today 17:15

John

maybe send me something on ancient science fiction and we’ll see about a supplementary article

Today 17:15   

Julia

Wow, thank you! I will certainly do that!  😊                                         

Today 17:16

John

It would be really great if you can link it up with actual science somehow …😊

Today 17:17   

Julia

I’ll try to do that. Actually there’s quite a few ancient books on mechanical devices and programmable automata

Today 17:18

Julia

They even had something like an animatronic theater and … vending machine

Today 17:18

John

Now that is cool! 😊 That’s the type of things we’re looking for: anticipations of recent technology

Today 17:18 

Julia

I’ll get to work then!😊                                                                              

Today 17:20

John

Thanks for contacting me, I look forward to your article.

Today 17:21

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

These are not the Robots you are looking for

These are not the Robots you are looking for

These are not the Robots you are looking for

 These are novel living machines. They’re neither a traditional robot nor a known species of animal. It’s a new class of artifact:
a living, programmable organism.

Joshua Bongard

Manuel and Sam are talking about the following video:
The electrical blueprints that orchestrate life

In this post the images comes from:

      1. Lennart Wittstock from Pexels
      2. Pete Linforth from Pixabay

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

Hi Sam, do you have a minute?

Today 11:38   

Sam

Hi Manuel, sure, you want to talk about robots again?  😊                     

Today 11:39  

Manuel

You guessed right! 😄

Today 11:39  

Sam

Ha! I love talking about robots 👾, so what can I do for you?                  

Today 11:40  

Manuel

I’m collaborating with a science writer, John, on a piece about the connections between science and Sci-Fi

Today 11:41   

Sam

I can see why you want to talk about robots then!                              

Today 11:42   

Manuel

Indeed! Actually, though, this is more about the history of robots …

Today 11:42   

Sam

OK, I do know some of that … and I’ve read and watched a lot of Sci-Fi! 😁

Today 11:43

Manuel

I guessed as much, but I’m not sure about these …

Today 11:44  

Sam

Oldies like Daleks and Cylons or something from Japanese anime?

Today 11:44  

Manuel

Nope: the original ones from “Rossum’s Universal Robots” by Karel Čapek

Today 11:45   

Sam

Wow, that play is 100 years old! But yeah,

I do know it actually … 😅                                                                         

Today 11:46   

Manuel

Then you know that his robots aren’t machines, but organic.

Today 11:47  

Sam

Indeed, quite surprisingly: organic robots “assembled ” in a factory

Today 11:47   

Manuel

And ultimately they develop feelings and become indistinguishable from humans

Today 11:48   

Sam

Yes, this was a very different cautionary tale from the Golem or Frankenstein

Today 11:48   

Manuel

My question is: is this feasible nowadays, with synthetic biology?

Today 11:49   

Sam

Well, not exactly no, we can’t assemble a whole adult human all at once from parts

Today 11:50   

Manuel

But?

Today 11:51   

Sam

We can clone organisms of course, and maybe within a decade even grow them in an artificial womb

Today 11:52   

Sam

but that is certainly not my area of expertise! And I don’t think we can pre-program an entire human brain … 😅

Today 11:52   

Manuel

So these are indeed very different robots. Thanks this was very useful! 😄

Today 11:53   

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …
Next week John will talk with Julia our student and mind passionate

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

The Computer and The Brain… they like to Sing a Song

The Computer and The Brain… they like to Sing a Song

The Computer and The Brain… they like to Sing a Song

Do not touch the machine

Anton Des Roubles: I am dead – my body is dead – but I still live.
I am this machine.
These racks of apparatus are my brain, which is thinking even as yours is..

John Campbell “The Infinite Brain” 1930

Cho and John are talking about the following article:
Brain Computer Interfaces: The reciprocal role of science fiction and reality

In this page the images comes from:

      1. Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
      2. Pete Linforth from Pixabay

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

John

Hi Cho, can I ask you some questions about brain implants?

Today 15:43

Cho

Hi John, sure, ask away 😉                                                                       

Today 15:43

John

I’m collaborating with a journalist, Manuel, on a piece about the connections between science and Sci-Fi

Today 15:43

Cho

Interesting, there’s a lot of hype an misinformation out there, this sounds useful. 🙂

Today 15:44

John

Indeed! Specifically, I’d like to go over one example of an implant from a book

Today 15:44   

Cho

OK, I’ve read a lot of sci-fi as a student, I hope I know it … 😄           

Today 15:45

John

It’s called “The Turing Option” by Harry Harrison and Marvin Minsky

Today 15:45   

Cho

I know Minsky of course!, he founded MIT’s AI laboratory!                 

Today 15:46

John

Good! So they co-wrote this book about a brain implant that can help heal brain damage

Today 15:46   

Cho

Cool, I don’t know the book, but I wish we had such a thing. How would this device work?

Today 15:47

John

Basically they implant a tiny supercomputer in the damaged area, which would reconnect severed neurons

Today 15:48   

Cho

That does sound like sci-fi indeed: the question is how?. 😏             

Today 15:48

John

They use something called “PNEP film chips—programmable neural electron pathway devices

Today 15:49   

John

these are “coated with living embryonic human nerve cells”, first attached to an external computer, later to the implant

Today 15:49  

Cho

This actually starts to sound realistic, Minsky knew what he was doing.

Today 15:50

John

So this checks out? We can do something like this nowadays?

Today 15:51   

Cho

Yes and no. Forget about the scale of the problem, we can’t deal with millions of neurons yet

Today 15:52

Cho

and even a supercomputer can’t keep up with the brain, let alone an implantable one!

Today 15:53

John

OK the problems of scale, but in principle? Repairing the brain?

Today 15:53   

Cho

Maybe. We can inject stem-cells and these would indeed reform connections in a damaged area,

Today 15:54

Cho

and we can implant a chip in the brain to receive and send impulses, “read and write” if you like.

Today 15:55

Cho

The trick would be to link those: guiding regrowth with AI.                
In principle, that should be possible.                         

Today 15:56

John

Great! Thank you so much!

Today 15:57   

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday
Next week John will talk with

Sam our Computer Scientist and AI Expert

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Brainwaves

Brainwaves

We could, just as is the case with the electrocardiogram for pathologies of the heart, find an objective research method for pathological changes in the activities of the central nervous system, which would be of the greatest significance for diagnostics

read more
The Ethical Pursuit

The Ethical Pursuit

New discoveries, new technologies, new social arrangements in the external world erupt into our lives in the form of increased turnover rates.
They set the stage for that potentially devastating social illness—future shock.

read more
We are Bee-men

We are Bee-men

Rather than speak of a group mind, it may thus be more appropriate to consider a beehive as a special kind of singular mind, albeit one that is spatially distributed over many (insect) bodies.

read more
Consciousless

Consciousless

Our common-sense conception of psychological phenomena constitutes a radically false theory, a theory so fundamentally defective that both the principles and the ontology of that theory will eventually be displaced, rather than smoothly reduced, by completed neuroscience.

read more

Life Imitating Science

Life Imitating Science

Life Imitating Science

Our children should be studying Arthur C. Clarke, William Tenn, Robert Heinlein, Ray Bradbury and Robert Sheckley, not because these writers can tell them about rocket ships and time machines but, more important, because they can lead young minds through an imaginative exploration of the jungle of political, social, psychological, and ethical issues that will confront these children as adults

Alvin Toffler

Manuel and John are talking about the following article:
The Prophets of Science Fiction Explores Sci-Fi’s Best Writers

In this post the images comes from:

      1. Amina Filkins from Pexels
      2. Miriam Espacio from Pexels
      3. Pete Linforth from Pixabay

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

Hi John, would you like to collaborate on some articles with me?

Today 11:41   

John

Hi Manuel, happy to! What is it about?                                                   

Today 11:42   

Manuel

Well, my editor saw this series from ten years ago: “Prophets of Science Fiction

Today 11:43   

Manuel

and now he wants to do a series of articles discussing science and sci-fi

Today 11:43   

John

Oooh, sounds interesting!                                                                        

Today 11:44   

Manuel

Yeah, seems that it made some controversial claims at the time

Today 11:45   

John

Like what?                                                                                                    

Today 11:45   

Manuel

Mostly that they exaggerated a lot, like Frankenstein anticipates superhuman cyborgs

Today 11:46  

John

Ouch, that is quite a stretch …                                                                 

Today 11:46   

Manuel

Actually, that’s why I am asking you to help out … to help keep hype out and realism in

Today 11:48   

John

Okay, I might be able to help, or otherwise know who to ask for help.

Today 11:48   

Manuel

Great! Much appreciated!

Today 11:49   

John

So are you going to use the same setup as the series? Should I watch it first?

Today 11:50   

Manuel

Actually, yes and no. We’re not going to use exactly the same list authors …

Today 11:51   

John

… but there likely will be some overlap                                                  

Today 11:51   

Manuel

Indeed, and science has moved on, we expect.

Today 11:52   

John

Ha! So what would you need from me, exactly?                                   

Today 11:52   

Manuel

I’ll send you some drafts, could you check them over with an expert on brains and brain implants?

Today 11:53   

John

Sure, I know just who to ask!                                                                    

Today 11:53   

Manuel

I’ll head over to a contact to talk about robots. See you later!

Today 11:54   

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …
Next week John will talk with Cho our Neuroscientist

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Total posts on the argument

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Where is my flying car?

Where is my flying car?

Where is my flying car?

The future is already here

it’s just not very evenly distributed

Introduction

Sometimes it feels like we are living in the future, with technology straight our of yesterday’s StarTrek: Computing devices in our pocket! Live video-chats with someone on the other side of the planet! Ordering food and playing music through voice commands anywhere in your home!
However, equally often, we don’t really even notice the enormous improvements and changes that technology has brought to society anymore. Think of all the transitions a middle aged person has gone through:
From vinyl long playing discs being normal and widespread, to the introduction of cassette tapes and the walkman, the DVD, and currently MP3 players and always-online mobile streaming of music. Which, in a sense, brings us back to old-fashioned transistor radios …

Sometimes, as users and consumers of technology, it remains invisible what happens “behind the scenes”. We want portable music to give our lives a soundtrack, whether through our favourite radio station or streaming service. Over the past century and a half, perhaps some of the most noticeable impacts of technology has been on everyday household chores “How the appliance boom moved more women into the workforce

Time spent on washing, cleaning, cooking, etc. plummeted from nearly sixty hours a week to less than twenty between 1900 and 1975, mostly thanks to relatively simple improvement in infrastructure and the more complex appliances exploiting them. Running water, gas, electricity, central heating, plus appliances using water and electricity such as washing machines, fridges, dishwashers, ovens, lights, etc. improved our lives noticeably and immeasurably. We keep a lookout for flashy inventions like flying cars and forget to take notice of boring infrastructural things like intercontinental submarine communications cables, which are a lot less dazzling than the Starlink internet satellite constellation. Yet, it is the infrastructure that allows technological innovation to spread and gain traction. Sometimes innovations adapt to the existing frameworks, like the internet over copper phone cables, sometimes infrastructure is adapted to new technology, like bicycles literally paved the way for cars ( “Roads were not built for cars”: how cyclists, not drivers, first fought to pave US roads ).

and then urban spaces were designed around the increasingly widespread use of cars. Nowadays battery powered devices are everywhere, from your mobile phone to your car, and more and more solar panels are being installed on private homes: all working on Direct Current, while the main grid is working on Alternating Current. With household batteries becoming an increasingly affordable option, perhaps the next step will be a home DC network (Compatibility of household appliances with DC microgrid for PV systems) Yet, beyond the conspicuous initial investment and the potential savings (How much electricity can we save by using direct current circuits in homes? Understanding the potential for electricity savings and assessing feasibility of a transition towards DC powered buildings), we probably won’t really notice, unless and until new appliances start coming with different plugs.

Now that more and more devices are always-on and electronic, plus the infrastructure of widespread internet and WiFi home networks, the “internet of things” (IoT) could be poised for a takeoff, leading to a truly smart AI-powered home (What Will Smart Homes Look Like 10 Years From Now?).
Infrastructural innovations that are so basic nowadays to almost be boring, can still yield a potentially life-changing innovation. What if you could control your home from your smartphone or through your voice? What would this empower us to do? From flipping a page in our cooking e-book while we have our hands full in the kitchen to enhancing autonomy for people with physical disabilities.

Many innovations might seem trivial and simple at first sight and can yet vastly improve the quality of life for many, even though they are not expressly meant as medical or therapeutic technologies. Inclusive design benefits everyone (The 7 Principles).

{

the 7 principles

  • Principle 1: Equitable Use
  • Principle 2: Flexibility in Use
  • Principle 3: Simple and Intuitive Use
  • Principle 4: Perceptible Information
  • Principle 5: Tolerance for Error
  • Principle 6: Low Physical Effort
  • Principle 7: Size and Space for Approach and Use

1997 North Carolina State University

Slow, invisible progress is still progress, whether we notice or not, and it may pave the way for much more radical innovations down the road. Is our current infrastructure holding us back? Is innovation creeping and seeping everywhere without us noticing?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In this post the images comes from:

  1. Harrison Haines from Pexels
  2. PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay

Related post