Conditioning the Moral Compass

Conditioning the Moral Compass

Conditioning the Moral Compass

He has no real choice, has he?
Self-interest, fear of physical pain, drove him to that grotesque act of self-abasement. Its insincerity was clearly to be seen. He ceases to be a wrongdoer. He ceases also to be a creature capable of moral choice

Burgess 1962

Manuel and Sandra are talking about the following article:
The ethics of brain–computer interfaces

In this post :

    1. ArtHouse Studio from Pexels
    2. PixxlTeufel from Pixabay

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

It gets worse?

Today 11:39  

Sandra

Sure, as think about facial recognition: useful as assistive technology for the blind, bad if used for racial profiling

Today 11:40  

Manuel

Right, I see what you mean

Today 11:41   

Sandra

Also with Brain Computer Interfaces and neurostimulation: what could it be used for?

Today 11:42   

Manuel

You tell me!

Today 11:43   

Sandra

Well, have you seen or read “Clockwork Orange” ?                            

Today 11:44   

Manuel

The old Kubrick movie?

Today 11:46  

Sandra

Yes, but it’s actually based on a book by Anthony Burgess.                  

Today 11:47   

Manuel

Right, I remember the main character, Alex, being somehow conditioned, right? 😉

Today 11:48  

Sandra

That’s right: aversion therapy to block bad behaviour. Like spraying your cat when it gets on the counter.

Today 11:49   

Manuel

Ok, so like behavioursim? Pavlov’s dogs?

Today 11:50   

Sandra

Exactly. The story criticizes the attempt to “re-train” someone to be good. What if we could do that directly in the brain?

Today 11:50   

Manuel

Oh my goodness! That’s straight-up mind control! 😣

Today 11:51   

Sandra

Yep, put your tinfoil hat on. 😄                                                                

Today 11:52   

Manuel

So there actually could be a way to do that? 🤔

Today 11:52   

Sandra

It is realistic enough that people are afraid about this possibility    

Today 11:52   

Manuel

Really? 😯

Today 11:53   

Sandra

Maybe not now and not with a decade, but think about how much computers have shrunk: from room size to pocket size    

Today 11:54   

Manuel

True, I even have one on my wrist …

Today 11:54   

Sandra

So what if everyone gets a Brain-Computer Interface in 50 years because it is useful and practical … and then it gets hacked? 

Today 11:55   

Manuel

Now suddenly it doesn’t sound so unreasonable anymore …

Today 11:56   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sandra  on Saturday 16th October…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Human-Computer Symbiosis

Human-Computer Symbiosis

Human-Computer Symbiosis

The hope is that, in not too many years, human brains and computing machines will be coupled together very tightly, and that the resulting partnership will think as no human brain has ever thought and process data in a way not approached by the information-handling machines we know today

Licklider 1960

Manuel and Sandra are talking about the following article:
Do Brain Implants Change Your Identity?

In this post :

    1. Darlene Alderson from Pexels
    2. Kevin Ku from Pexels 

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Sandra

There are various means and goals when measuring and stimulating the brain, it’s not easy to say stuff in general about this.

Today 11:39  

Sandra

It’s not like you install a USB hub in the brain and then hook up your laptop

Today 11:39  

Manuel

No, I get that, sure. And it seems to be ethically controversial too 😅

Today 11:39  

Sandra

Absolutely! Even before staring human trials for a new device, we need to think things through.

Today 11:40  

Manuel

What are some of the questions that come up?

Today 11:41   

Sandra

For more general research: what could it be used for? And how could it be abused?

Today 11:42   

Sandra

For specific devices: what happens if it does or doesn’t work? And how will people react to their implant?

Today 11:42   

Manuel

Could you elaborate on that last one?

Today 11:43   

Sandra

Sure. It is always a risk that people reject the implant, in the sense that it feels weird to them

Today 11:44   

Sandra

Having a computer “control” what you do feels creepy, even if it allows you to walk or talk again.

Today 11:44   

Manuel

I think I understand: the implanted device feels alien, and it’s not like a walking stick you can leave behind

Today 11:46  

Sandra

Nope: it is part of you now, more like the hip replacement that you cannot take out.

Today 11:47   

Sandra

So we need to educate and guide people in understanding the procedure and functionality

Today 11:47   

Manuel

But still: if it helps you live a more normal life, why would there be a problem. 🤔

Today 11:48  

Sandra

Well, Deep Brain Stimulation was developed as treatment for Parkinson’s at first

Today 11:49   

Manuel

It reduces the tremors?

Today 11:50   

Sandra

Yes, but it is also being used for mental health issues, like depression or OCD.

Today 11:50   

Sandra

People feel that it interferes with their autonomy: who am I anymore?

Today 11:51   

Manuel

I see, the risk is that it takes away agency and decision making form the patient.

Today 11:51   

Sandra

Exactly, but it gets worse!                                                               

Today 11:52   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sandra  on Saturday 9th October…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Brainwaves

Brainwaves

Brainwaves

I was driven mostly by practical questions, indeed also by the question whether we could, just as is the case with the electrocardiogram for pathologies of the heart, find an objective research method for pathological changes in the activities of the central nervous system, which would be of the greatest significance for diagnostics

Berger 1929

Manuel and Sandra are talking about the following article:
The History of Neuroimaging Techniques

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Sandra

So the category of Implantable Medical Devices is quite large and diverse

Today 11:39  

Sandra

The most common ones are probably lens implants for cataracts   

Today 11:39  

Manuel

Oh, I hadn’t thought of those! My grandma had that!

Today 11:39  

Sandra

Yep, very common, and knee replacements are more common than hip replacements

Today 11:40  

Manuel

OK, sure, but stuff like this is … an old hat, right? We’ve been doing this for a long time?

Today 11:41   

Sandra

Absolutely, knee replacements started in the 19th century already

Today 11:42   

Manuel

Now what about the new and controversial devices? You mentioned working on a brain implant?

Today 11:44   

Sandra

That’s right, a neurostimulator for chronic back pain after spinal injury

Today 11:42   

Manuel

Cool! So what does that do exactly? 😁

Today 11:46  

Sandra

After a spinal injury a lot of people develop chronic pain and our device basically intercepts the pain signals

Today 11:42   

Manuel

So we can detect and block such specific signals?

Today 11:46  

Sandra

There are various techniques to measure brain activity, like an EEG or fMRI

Today 11:48   

Sandra

An EEG is an “electroencephalogram”: measuring electrical activity on the scalp that corresponds to activity in the brain.

Today 11:42   

Sandra

fMRI is “Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging”, measuring brain activity by measuring blood flow in the brain

Today 11:42   

Manuel

OK, I did know about those. These are non-invasive, without surgery, right?

Today 11:48  

Sandra

Right, but with surgery we can also put electrodes directly in the brain

Today 11:49   

Manuel

Like Deep Brain Stimulation? 😵‍

Today 11:50   

Sandra

Well, there is a difference between measuring and stimulating, but basically yes.

Today 11:50   

Manuel

And then you can hook the electrodes up to a computer?

Today 11:51   

Sandra

Not always, but, yes, that is a possibility                                                

Today 11:51   

Manuel

That’s the kind of implantable device I was talking about: Brain-Computer Interfaces!

Today 11:51   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sandra  on Saturday 2nd October…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Total posts on the argument

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Hips of Steel

Hips of Steel

Hips of Steel

 Gentlemen, we can rebuild him.

We have the technology.
We have the capability to make the word’s first bionic man

Steve Austin will be that man

Better than he was before. Better…stronger…faster.

The Six Million Dollar Man

Manuel and Sandra are talking about the following article:
Can a computer fool you into thinking it is human?

In this post :

    1. Video by Pressmaster from Pexels
    2. Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko from Pexels

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

Hi Sandra, would you be up for a quick interview?

Today 11:38   

Sandra

Hi Manuel, sure. What about?                                                           

Today 11:39  

Manuel

Medical technology I have to review, and I’d like to see a doctor about that …

Today 11:39  

Sandra

Ha! Well, I actually am that kind of doctor!                                      

Today 11:40  

Manuel

Excellent! My questions aren’t about the technology per sè though

Today 11:41   

Sandra

Good, because bolts and screws aren’t really my thing                

Today 11:42   

Manuel

I wish this stuff was made of bolts and screws … I constantly have to look stuff up

Today 11:44   

Sandra

So are you talking about assistive devices? Healthcare robots?

Today 11:45   

Manuel

Not this time, no this is about Implantable Medical Devices, like neuroprosthetics 😁

Today 11:46  

Sandra

Wow, yes those are really interesting 🤔🤔                                         

Today 11:46   

Manuel

Do you have any experience with IMD’s?

Today 11:47   

Sandra

I do, a few years back I collaborated in a research project on a brain implant

Today 11:48   

Manuel

Great! Tell me everything 😊😊

Today 11:48  

Sandra

Actually, implantable medical devices are very common nowadays

Today 11:49   

Manuel

They are? 😵‍

Today 11:50   

Sandra

Sure, it’s not just about cutting-edge neural implants, also your aunt’s new hip is an IMD

Today 11:50   

Manuel

… my aunt actually did get hip replacement surgery last year …!

Today 11:51   

Sandra

There you go, and my father in law has a pacemaker: also an IMD

Today 11:51   

Manuel

You’re absolutely right of course, but the public wants to know about the new shiny stuff

Today 11:51   

Sandra

We’ll get there, never fear!                                                                      

Today 11:52   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sandra  on Saturday 25th September…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Total posts on the argument

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

We are Bee-men

We are Bee-men

We are Bee-men

{

Rather than speak of a group mind, it may thus be more appropriate to consider a beehive as a special kind of singular mind, albeit one that is spatially distributed over many (insect) bodies.

Theiner 2014, 304

What is so special about our brains?
Our brains somehow make it possible for us to think. How? And why?
As long as we don’t know, we should keep an open mind about how this works.

You get brains in all sorts of shapes and sizes. Among humans, now and up and down the evolutionary tree, as well as animals.
How large and complex does a brain need to be in order to produce consciousness?
Do minds also come in all sorts of shapes and sizes?

The more an animal is similar to us, the more their brains and perceptual organs are similar to ours, the more we might assume that their minds might be similar to ours as well. We might be able to imagine what it is like to be a primate, like a chimpanzee, or a mammal, like a dog or a cat.
Can we also imagine what it’s like to be a bat ?

Our experiences are very different: echolocation, flying, liking the taste of bugs, etc. And then there might be truly alien minds, like hive minds in a swarm of bees. Can we ever know what that would be like? How each tiny member of a hive contributes to the emergent complex behavior of the swarm as a whole? Actually, what if we are a hive mind ourselves? After all, our conscious mind emerges from the complex interaction of millions of neurons.

Maybe the hive mind of a swarm of insects likewise doesn’t even consider itself to be a “hive mind”, but thinks of its components just like we sometimes think about ours: we have a brain, a body, limbs, etc. None of them is conscious in the way that “we” are conscious, as individual subjects, just like a single bee isn’t conscious in the way that a hive mind might be conscious. But if all it takes for us to be conscious is a bunch of neurons having complex interactions, why couldn’t parts of our brains be also independently conscious, just like individual bees have some form of autonomous consciousness? Where does consciousness stop?

In this post the images comes from:

  1. Mariya 🌸🌺🌼 from Pixabay
  2. PollyDot from Pixabay

If we think that humans are conscious thanks to their brains, then primates, mammals, vertebrates, etc. with ever simpler brains should have ever simpler minds, but still have some form of consciousness. Where do we draw the line? By some estimates, a bee has about a million neurons, compared to a human brain having around 20 billion.

Can we imagine, internally in our own brains, that there would be “swarms”, sub-groups of neurons exhibiting some limited from of consciousness, independently from our overall consciousness? Then we might start to relate even to hive minds. Still, we do not experience ourselves as brains, as a swarm of neurons, as something emerging from layers upon layers of complex interactions of less conscious entities.
We cannot ultimately assume that perspective, we cannot experience the “what it is like” of the individual composing the swarm, just like a hive mind cannot take the perspective of a single bee.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post