Future of Days Past

Future of Days Past

Future of Days Past

Science fiction is often described, and even defined, as extrapolative. The science fiction writer is supposed to take a trend or phenomenon of the here-and-now, purify and intensify it for dramatic effect, and extend it into the future.

Strictly extrapolative works of science fiction generally arrive about where the Club of Rome arrives: somewhere between the gradual extinction of human liberty and the total extinction of terrestrial life

Introduction toThe Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula Le Guin,1969

Manuel and John are talking about the following article:
It’s not about tomorrow, 1: Ursula Le Guin

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

Hi there John, everything allright?

Today 11:41   

John

Hi Manuel, yep, I got all kinds of feedback and suggestions 😊        

Today 11:42   

Manuel

That’s great! My editor will be pleased 😊

Today 11:43   

John

A student of Cho also sent me some very interesting material about the history of science fiction linked to the history of science

Today 11:44   

Manuel

Oh, very interesting! Were you thinking of a follow-up for context?

Today 11:45   

John

Indeed, a supplementary article, I’ll forward it to you with my comments.

Today 11:45   

Manuel

I’ll check it out and forward it to my editor then.

Today 11:46  

John

Thanks! I think it does add depth and perspective 😉                        

Today 11:46   

Manuel

So what do you think about the piece as it is?

Today 11:48   

John

Well, we did add a lot of new innovations beyond the “Prophets of Science Fiction” series …

Today 11:48   

Manuel

I sense some hesitation in your words …?

Today 11:49   

John

Yeah, well I just think we should add something about he ethical and societal implications of it all

Today 11:50   

Manuel

That’s a good point actually, not just hyping or criticizing the hype would be nice 😊

Today 11:51   

John

Also a lot of these science fiction authors did precisely that: look at how technology changes society

Today 11:51   

Manuel

Then we should definitely include something more reflective, a more abstract perspective

Today 11:52   

John

Thanks to Julia, Cho’s student, we have some historical perspective, but we’d need ethics of technology

Today 11:52   

Manuel

You’re right, there’s a lot of work being one on that front, which we might include in a follow up

Today 11:53   

John

I’ll check out some of the projects underway to guide responsible innovation

Today 11:53   

Manuel

Good idea! 😊I’ll pitch the need for a follow up article to my editor!

Today 11:54   

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Sketchy AI

Sketchy AI

“Young man, you don’t think I’m encountering constructive symbolism for the first time, do you? “Unplug”: free yourself from physicality, from the vulgar earthbound physicality, from the evils of civilization, from electricity, nerves, and so on. Isn’t that what this is? The association is crystal clear, I’d be tempted to say, perhaps even too obvious” (Kishon 1987)

read more

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

More than one Way to Reskin a Cat

More than one Way to Reskin a Cat

More than one Way to Reskin a Cat

But you comprehend the result ? Man’s complete triumph over disease by this process of dissolution and rehabilitation

A Witch City Mystery Frederick van Rensselaer Dey, 1901

Manuel and Sandra are talking about the following article: The futuristic processes that are making medicine better today

In this post :
    1. Chermiti Mohamed from Pexels

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

Hi Sandra, I need some advice on medical technology! 😊

Today 11:41   

Sandra

Hi Manuel, hopefully not for yourself …?                                               

Today 11:42   

Manuel

No, thank goodness, for a piece I’m writing. 😊

Today 11:43   

Sandra

Oh, ok, always glad to help. 😊                                                                

Today 11:44   

Manuel

OK, rapid fire questions about science or sci-fi! Ready!

Today 11:46  

Sandra

I sure hope so: ready!                                                                                

Today 11:47   

Manuel

Artificial wombs?

Today 11:48  

Sandra

There’s some in the animal testing stage, but just for premature births, not right from conception: Artificial Womb

Today 11:49   

Manuel

OK. Tricorders

Today 11:50   

Sandra

Tricorders? 🤔                                                                                            

Today 11:51   

Manuel

It’s a term from Star Trek: a handheld device that can provide a quick diagnosis

Today 11:52   

Sandra

Oh, well, those exist or are in development for some specific cases, not an overall diagnosis: Medical Tricorders

Today 11:53   

Manuel

Great! Last one is an open question: what is the most sci-fi-like real development?

Today 11:53   

Sandra

Where do I begin! There’s so much going on in medical technology nowadays …

Today 11:54   

Manuel

Prosthetics and Exoskeletons?

Today 11:54   

Sandra

Maybe, but I’m more exited by biological breakthroughs involving living tissue

Today 11:55   

Manuel

Tell me all about it!

Today 11:56   

Sandra

There’s been some serious advances in regenerative medicine, for example for the skin

Today 11:57   

Sandra

you can just spray on a thin layer of healthy cells from the patient, instead of using grafts: Advances in Skin Tissue

Today 11:57   

Manuel

Wow that does sound like sci-fi to me!

Today 11:58   

Sandra

Lucky for us it isn’t: it’s science!  😉                                                        

Today 11:59   

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Zap goes the Neuron

Zap goes the Neuron

If I do not greatly deceive myself, I have succeeded in realizing… the hundred years’ dream of physicists and physiologists, to wit, the identity of the nervous principle with electricity

read more

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

These are not the Robots you are looking for

These are not the Robots you are looking for

These are not the Robots you are looking for

 These are novel living machines. They’re neither a traditional robot nor a known species of animal. It’s a new class of artifact:
a living, programmable organism.

Joshua Bongard

Manuel and Sam are talking about the following video:
The electrical blueprints that orchestrate life

In this post the images comes from:

      1. Lennart Wittstock from Pexels
      2. Pete Linforth from Pixabay

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

Hi Sam, do you have a minute?

Today 11:38   

Sam

Hi Manuel, sure, you want to talk about robots again?  😊                     

Today 11:39  

Manuel

You guessed right! 😄

Today 11:39  

Sam

Ha! I love talking about robots 👾, so what can I do for you?                  

Today 11:40  

Manuel

I’m collaborating with a science writer, John, on a piece about the connections between science and Sci-Fi

Today 11:41   

Sam

I can see why you want to talk about robots then!                              

Today 11:42   

Manuel

Indeed! Actually, though, this is more about the history of robots …

Today 11:42   

Sam

OK, I do know some of that … and I’ve read and watched a lot of Sci-Fi! 😁

Today 11:43

Manuel

I guessed as much, but I’m not sure about these …

Today 11:44  

Sam

Oldies like Daleks and Cylons or something from Japanese anime?

Today 11:44  

Manuel

Nope: the original ones from “Rossum’s Universal Robots” by Karel Čapek

Today 11:45   

Sam

Wow, that play is 100 years old! But yeah,

I do know it actually … 😅                                                                         

Today 11:46   

Manuel

Then you know that his robots aren’t machines, but organic.

Today 11:47  

Sam

Indeed, quite surprisingly: organic robots “assembled ” in a factory

Today 11:47   

Manuel

And ultimately they develop feelings and become indistinguishable from humans

Today 11:48   

Sam

Yes, this was a very different cautionary tale from the Golem or Frankenstein

Today 11:48   

Manuel

My question is: is this feasible nowadays, with synthetic biology?

Today 11:49   

Sam

Well, not exactly no, we can’t assemble a whole adult human all at once from parts

Today 11:50   

Manuel

But?

Today 11:51   

Sam

We can clone organisms of course, and maybe within a decade even grow them in an artificial womb

Today 11:52   

Sam

but that is certainly not my area of expertise! And I don’t think we can pre-program an entire human brain … 😅

Today 11:52   

Manuel

So these are indeed very different robots. Thanks this was very useful! 😄

Today 11:53   

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …
Next week John will talk with Julia our student and mind passionate

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Sketchy AI

Sketchy AI

“Young man, you don’t think I’m encountering constructive symbolism for the first time, do you? “Unplug”: free yourself from physicality, from the vulgar earthbound physicality, from the evils of civilization, from electricity, nerves, and so on. Isn’t that what this is? The association is crystal clear, I’d be tempted to say, perhaps even too obvious” (Kishon 1987)

read more

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Life Imitating Science

Life Imitating Science

Life Imitating Science

Our children should be studying Arthur C. Clarke, William Tenn, Robert Heinlein, Ray Bradbury and Robert Sheckley, not because these writers can tell them about rocket ships and time machines but, more important, because they can lead young minds through an imaginative exploration of the jungle of political, social, psychological, and ethical issues that will confront these children as adults

Alvin Toffler

Manuel and John are talking about the following article:
The Prophets of Science Fiction Explores Sci-Fi’s Best Writers

In this post the images comes from:

      1. Amina Filkins from Pexels
      2. Miriam Espacio from Pexels
      3. Pete Linforth from Pixabay

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Manuel

Hi John, would you like to collaborate on some articles with me?

Today 11:41   

John

Hi Manuel, happy to! What is it about?                                                   

Today 11:42   

Manuel

Well, my editor saw this series from ten years ago: “Prophets of Science Fiction

Today 11:43   

Manuel

and now he wants to do a series of articles discussing science and sci-fi

Today 11:43   

John

Oooh, sounds interesting!                                                                        

Today 11:44   

Manuel

Yeah, seems that it made some controversial claims at the time

Today 11:45   

John

Like what?                                                                                                    

Today 11:45   

Manuel

Mostly that they exaggerated a lot, like Frankenstein anticipates superhuman cyborgs

Today 11:46  

John

Ouch, that is quite a stretch …                                                                 

Today 11:46   

Manuel

Actually, that’s why I am asking you to help out … to help keep hype out and realism in

Today 11:48   

John

Okay, I might be able to help, or otherwise know who to ask for help.

Today 11:48   

Manuel

Great! Much appreciated!

Today 11:49   

John

So are you going to use the same setup as the series? Should I watch it first?

Today 11:50   

Manuel

Actually, yes and no. We’re not going to use exactly the same list authors …

Today 11:51   

John

… but there likely will be some overlap                                                  

Today 11:51   

Manuel

Indeed, and science has moved on, we expect.

Today 11:52   

John

Ha! So what would you need from me, exactly?                                   

Today 11:52   

Manuel

I’ll send you some drafts, could you check them over with an expert on brains and brain implants?

Today 11:53   

John

Sure, I know just who to ask!                                                                    

Today 11:53   

Manuel

I’ll head over to a contact to talk about robots. See you later!

Today 11:54   

… Continue reading our conversations that are posted every Saturday …
Next week John will talk with Cho our Neuroscientist

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Total posts on the argument

Sketchy AI

Sketchy AI

“Young man, you don’t think I’m encountering constructive symbolism for the first time, do you? “Unplug”: free yourself from physicality, from the vulgar earthbound physicality, from the evils of civilization, from electricity, nerves, and so on. Isn’t that what this is? The association is crystal clear, I’d be tempted to say, perhaps even too obvious” (Kishon 1987)

read more

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Natural Born Cyborgs

Natural Born Cyborgs

Natural Born Cyborgs

Human!
We used to be exactly like them… Flawed, Weak, Organic
But we evolved to include the synthetic
Now we use both to attain perfection

The Borg

Manuel and Sandra are talking about the following article:
Scientists Warn of “Bleak Cyborg Future” From Brain-Computer Interfaces

In this post :

    1. Nandu Vasudevan from Pixabay
    2. Cottonbro from Pexels

In this post the dialogue is realised by an interaction of virtual characters, for more information please check the page “Virtual characters

Sandra

It may sound very apocalyptic, but it is a very remote possibility.     

Today 11:40  

Sandra

And yet something that we have to think about before it is too late.

Today 11:40  

Manuel

Absolutely! We do want policies in place for how things should be used.

Today 11:41   

Sandra

Right, and that’s why we collaborated not just with engineers and programmes, but with doctors, patients, ethicists, etc.

Today 11:42   

Manuel

Sounds like a very good idea. Still: are you a cyborg when you have an IMD? 😅

Today 11:43   

Sandra

Wow, that’s quite the question! I’m not sure, it seems like a gradual thing …

Today 11:44   

Manuel

Gradual? What do you mean? 🤔

Today 11:46  

Sandra

Well, “cyborg” sounds like you’re half a robot, not a natural human anymore.

Today 11:47   

Sandra

But we do so many other things that aren’t, you know, “biologically” natural

Today 11:47   

Manuel

Like, … wearing clothes? Unlike animals? 😉

Today 11:48  

Sandra

Yeah, maybe that is how it started, but think of everything else too: fire, tool use, building houses, etc.

Today 11:49   

Sandra

and then specifically changing our bodies. Wouldn’t every medical intervention make you “unnatural” then?

Today 11:49   

Manuel

There actually are some religions that suggest stuff like that …

Today 11:50   

Sandra

I know, but that’s not how I feel. Am I a cyborg for wearing glasses? Wearing contacts? Getting eye surgery? 🤓

Today 11:51   

Manuel

I see what you mean with “gradual” now …

Today 11:52   

Sandra

It’s not like a BCI or IMD takes over, it modifies who you are and how you act, just like a pill, or a glass of wine 

Today 11:53   

Manuel

So, it’s more subtle than that

Today 11:53   

Sandra

Exactly. It’s not like a pacemaker or a BCI turn you into a robot, in a sense it is not unlike any other tool, but now it is part of your body. 

Today 11:54   

Manuel

And because it changes what you can do, it is of ethical concern?

Today 11:54   

Sandra

Yes, anything that restores our capacity for action or gives us new options, raises ethical issues 

Today 11:55   

Manuel

Thank you so much! This has been very helpful! 😊

Today 11:56   

… Continue to read the conversation between Manuel and Sandra  on Saturday 23th October…

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading...

Related post

Zap goes the Neuron

Zap goes the Neuron

If I do not greatly deceive myself, I have succeeded in realizing… the hundred years’ dream of physicists and physiologists, to wit, the identity of the nervous principle with electricity

read more

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.